Support or challenge the soundness of Glickman's reasons for the new code.
Saturday, September 22, 2007
New Code
Support or challenge the soundness of Glickman's reasons for the new code.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The past 20 years of 24/7 mass communications have brought us such growth in the prevalence of persuasive messages that the average media consumer is nearly always being sold something ~ be it an opinion or a product. Here students in Journalism 542, Public Opinion and Propaganda, will share their thoughts and discoveries about the world of spin. Note to contributors: The date on the prompt is the deadline for posting.
2 comments:
First off, I think with only 3 categories to choose from, the critics who decide what the movie ratings are will have a tougher decision to make and it will inhibit some movies from getting a fair rating. However, no system will ever be perfect and personal responsibility is needed to make sure the audience is suited to the movie.
Secondly, I don't think the independent film makers will start letting their movies be rated now just because the rating system has changed. They don't let their movies be rated for more reasons than that (ex: it doesn't matter to them what the rating is, they will still be getting their movie published and played) To be "branded unacceptable" would be a disgrace to why they are independent producers in the first place.
Why wouldn't sorting any collection of items into three groups be easier than sorting them into five groups, particularly if the argument has been made that there is little substantial difference between or among the various groups? For example, in this case, what really is the substantive difference between PG and PG-13 and which of the two is the more rigorous rating? In either case, a child can view these films without an adult.
Post a Comment